Defender Launches Immigration Law Practice

The new practice will expand the office’s ability to protect noncitizens facing immigration consequences.

 

PHILADELPHIA—The Defender Association of Philadelphia today announced the launch of its new Immigration Law Practice (ILP), expanding the office’s ability to protect noncitizens facing immigration consequences—both those navigating the criminal legal system and individuals with no contact with it.

 

As immigration enforcement has grown more aggressive, even a minor case–or no criminal contact at all–can put noncitizens at risk of detention, family separation, or deportation. The new ILP brings dedicated legal expertise into the Defender Association to ensure noncitizens receive accurate advice, informed advocacy, and representation.

 

“For many of our clients, one court case can change the course of their entire lives,” said Chief Defender Keisha Hudson, “In the current climate, it’s critical that noncitizens have attorneys who understand how closely the criminal and immigration systems are connected—and who can advocate for outcomes that don’t cause unnecessary harm.”

 

The Immigration Law Practice will be led by Lilah Thompson, an experienced immigration attorney with a strong background in representing noncitizens facing complex legal challenges. She will be working alongside trial attorneys, social workers, and mitigation specialists to identify immigration risks early and help shape defense strategies that protect clients and their families whenever possible.

 

“Too often, people are forced to navigate a system that doesn’t fully account for the consequences they face as noncitizens,” Thompson said. “This unit is about making sure our clients have clear information, strong advocacy, and a real chance to protect their futures.”

 

The launch of the Immigration Law Practice was made possible through the support of key partners and funders, including the Stoneleigh Foundation, City of Philadelphia and the Parker Administration. Their investment reflects a shared commitment to fairness, due process, and a justice system that works better for everyone.

 

“We’re deeply grateful to the Stoneleigh Foundation, City Council and Mayor Parker for recognizing the urgency of this work,” Hudson said. “Sustained funding will be essential to ensure this practice can grow and continue meeting the needs of noncitizen clients across Philadelphia.”

 

The Defender Association also emphasized that protecting noncitizens involved in the justice system requires collaboration across institutions. Courts, prosecutors, law enforcement agencies, and policymakers all have a role to play by supporting diversion, considering immigration consequences in legal decisions, and committing to practices that respect due process and human dignity.

 

“When justice system partners work together thoughtfully, we can reduce unnecessary harm and strengthen families and communities,” Hudson added. “This new practice is an important step—but lasting change depends on continued partnership and investment.”

 

# # #

 

 

Emergency Bail Hearings Safely Release 200 People

EBH has also helped reduce Philly’s prison population by over 1,000

 

PHILADELPHIA—One year after launching the Emergency Bail Hearing (EBH) initiative, the Defender Association of Philadelphia has helped more than 200 people safely return home while awaiting trial. Between October 7, 2024, and October 7, 2025, 230 people had their cases heard in Emergency Bail Hearings before Judge Karen Simmons. Of those, 216 people —93.9%— were ordered released. 

 

“This is what happens when justice system partners work together toward a shared goal of fairness and safety,” said Chief Defender Keisha Hudson, “The Emergency Bail Hearing program has given hundreds of Philadelphians a chance to fight their cases from home, stay connected to their families, and access the services they need to improve their lives.”

 

The EBH initiative is a collaboration between the Defender Association, the Philadelphia Department of Prisons (PDP), the First Judicial District (FJD), and the District Attorney’s Office (DAO). The program was launched to respond to the urgent need to safely reduce the city’s jail population amid severe staffing shortages and unsafe conditions.

 

Since the EBH program began, Philadelphia’s jail population has dropped dramatically — from 4,700 in October 2024 to under 3,600 since April 2025. While the Emergency Bail Hearings are only one part of this progress, they demonstrate what’s possible when justice system partners coordinate effectively.

 

“This program is proof that dialog and cooperation between Philly’s justice system stakeholders works,” said Hudson, “Working together to identify people who can be safely released is just one way we can create a more just and sustainable system for everyone.”

# # #

Statement on Return of “Sweeps” to Kensington

Arresting and displacing people in crisis won’t make Kensington safer—real support and investment will.

 

PHILADELPHIA— “The Defender Association of Philadelphia has serious concerns about the City’s resumption of police sweeps in Kensington—an approach we warned against last year. As we said then, these tactics target people who are already struggling: people without housing, people living with addiction, and people who need care—not cuffs. Pushing people from one block to another without real support doesn’t make anyone safer.

 

“City officials promised a more compassionate strategy, including a “Wellness Court” meant to offer treatment instead of punishment. But so far, that hasn’t happened in any meaningful way. People are still facing charges without a clear path to treatment, housing and other critical supports. Once again, we’re seeing the system respond to a public health crisis with arrests and incarceration. The Defender Association is present in Wellness Court to assist with the lifting of bench warrants, but everyone who has an out-of-county detainer is being sent to the prisons, risking their safety. 

 

“As public defenders, we work every day to connect our clients with the services they need. But we’re doing it with too few resources—and now with four additional treatment programs closing in Philadelphia- there are less resources now more than ever to meet the increasing need for treatment. Our office has led the effort to safely decarcerate the jails so the City can comply with a federal contempt order. The City’s return to police sweeps undermines that progress and puts our clients and prison staff at risk.

 

We need a seat at the table in the city’s public safety plan. If leaders are serious about helping Kensington, they must include us in the planning and invest in what actually works: stable housing, mental health care, harm reduction, and legal advocacy.

 

“We’ve seen that real investment makes communities safer. Displacement and arrest do not.”
 

 

Statement on New Prison Oversight Board

PHILADELPHIA— “Philadelphia voters have approved the ballot measure to establish a permanent Prison Oversight Board in the City Charter—marking a major step toward accountability, transparency, and basic human rights in our local jails.

 

“With this vote, our city has sent a clear message: we will no longer look away from the unacceptable conditions faced by incarcerated people and prison employees. This result reflects years of planning, organizing and advocating for transparency and accountability.
 

“We are grateful to the voters, our advocacy partners, and Councilmembers Isaiah Thomas and Nicolas O’Rourke, who worked so hard to make this moment possible. The people have spoken, and they are saying ‘no’ to dangerous and inhumane conditions on State Road and ‘yes’ to oversight, accountability, and dignity.

 

“The Defender Association looks forward to working with the new board, City Council, and community partners to ensure real oversight and lasting change.”

 

# # #

Statement on the Detention of a Defender Client by ICE

People living in Philadelphia should have the right to due process, regardless of their immigration status.

 

“Last week, after a Defender Association client’s case was dismissed at a preliminary hearing for lack of evidence, he was detained by law enforcement and transferred to the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), even though there was no outstanding warrant.

 

“We’ve raised this matter with the Courts, Philadelphia Police Department, Sheriff’s Office, District Attorney’s Office, Law Department, and City Council, and we are in active communication with immigrant rights organizations across the city.

 

“The Defender Association has long held that no one should be subjected to immigration enforcement while seeking justice in our courts. What happened last week is a deeply troubling reminder of the real risks faced by non-citizens navigating our justice system. It underscores the urgent need for the city to invest in legal protections for immigrant communities, including the creation of a fully staffed Immigration Unit at the Defender Association, a core priority outlined in our FY26 budget request.

 

“We remain committed to protecting the rights of all Philadelphians and fighting for a justice system that is fair and safe for everyone, regardless of immigration status.”

 

# # #

Testimony: Diversion Programs in Kensington

On February 26, 2025 Chief Defender Keisha Hudson & Managing Director of Trials Andrew Pappas testified before City Council about how Philly can do better for people struggling with addiction. While programs like the Accelerated Misdemeanor Program (AMP) and Forensic Intensive Recovery (FIR) are helping, too many end up in jail instead of getting the help they need. Read the full testimony below, or download a printable version here.

Watch the testimony video below:

Good morning, Chairwoman Lozada and Members of the Committee. I’m Keisha Hudson, Chief Defender for the Defender Association of Philadelphia. On behalf of the Defender Association, I want to thank you for inviting us to testify today on the effectiveness of diversion programs for individuals suffering from substance use disorder in the Kensington area.

 

In my 22 years as a public defender, I have represented countless individuals whose struggles with addiction led them into the criminal legal system—many of them had no opportunities for treatment extended to them until they were enmeshed in the criminal legal system. I have seen firsthand how our clients get into the system, what solutions work, and how we can sustain, expand, and strengthen the diversion programs that will help them break the cycle of addiction, succeed in recovery, and successfully reenter their communities. 

 

Accelerated Misdemeanor Program:

 

The Accelerated Misdemeanor Program (AMP) is a post-arrest diversionary program that is available for eligible arrestees with no or minimal criminal histories who are facing charges for non-violent misdemeanors. This program is a collaborative effort between our office, the Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual Disabilities, Public Health Management Corporation, the Philadelphia Police Department and the District Attorney’s Office. In November 2024, stakeholders agreed to expand eligibility criteria, allowing for more individualized participant assessments. AMP Court runs weekly and recent investments from city council, led by Councilmember Squilla and supported by many members of this committee, have improved our capacity to provide direct legal services and connection to treatment providers.

 

In the last four months (October 2024 - January 2025), we observed 446 referrals to AMP and only one revocation from the program. This high rate of success is in part attributable to the treatment providers presence in the courtroom, real time updates on program availability, and the direct transportation to treatment services they provide. Our office is also physically present to provide warm hand-offs for our clients directly to the treatment providers. 

 

Forensic Intensive Recovery (FIR) Program:

 

The FIR program was established in 1991 in response to a federal consent decree related to overcrowding in Philadelphia jails. FIR referrals were implemented as a population reduction strategy by removing those in need of treatment. While an alternative to incarceration program, and not a true diversion initiative, this program is typically discussed within the context of diversionary programming in the city.

 

Essentially, individuals who are incarcerated are referred for evaluation by a FIR evaluator to see if they qualify  for release in favor of placement at a substance abuse or mental health treatment facility. The evaluators are contracted by the City of Philadelphia to conduct the evaluations, generate and distribute reports, and assist in matching the client with an appropriate level of care. Our office processes all FIR referrals for our clients as well as those referred by private and court appointed attorneys.

 

As a result of our attorneys direct experience representing clients, we decided to take a closer look at the wait times people referred to the FIR program experience. We looked at referrals made from April to June 2024.  During that time period 654 FIRs were filed for 615 unique individuals. For 37 individuals, more than 1 FIR was filed on their behalf during an identical incarceration event so we only counted one FIR. For 2 individuals, more than 1 FIR was filed but during different incarceration periods, so we counted them as two unique referrals. So our final referral count was 617 FIRs for 615 individuals

 

Our review revealed that on average, it takes over two months for incarcerated people referred to FIR to be released from the jail. On average it takes 35 days from referral for the incarcerated person to be evaluated and then another 12 days for the report to be generated and circulated to justice system stakeholders. In 18% of referrals (113 individuals), the clients were released from the jail prior to their evaluation and were never evaluated by FIR. This is a missed opportunity to intervene. While we don’t usually discuss re-arrest, 45 of the clients (39%) released prior to their evaluation were subsequently re-arrested and re-admitted to the jail within 6 months. 

 

This process is simply not a sustainable solution to the substance use crisis we are facing in the city right now. Here at Defender, our social services staff are able to connect clients with evaluations and appropriate placement more effectively and efficiently than this process. But with limited social service advocates, serving all of our clients’ social services needs, we do not have the capacity to provide direct case management and coordination services to meet this need.

 

An additional investment in our office to expand our social services capacity to better serve all of our clients with substance use and behavioral health needs, especially those residing in or arrested in Kensington would go a long way to reducing the jail population, reducing recidivism, and offering the types of interventions people need when they are in the best position to voluntarily accept help and participate in treatment.

 

The Neighborhood Wellness Court (NWC) represents an important acknowledgment that substance use disorder is a public health crisis, not a criminal justice issue. But it ignores some of the more complicated realities of addiction and recovery. In theory, NWC offers participants an opportunity to engage in treatment and social services instead of incarceration. While this approach has the potential to help some individuals stabilize their lives, the approach relies on the threat of prosecution for a summary offense, without more, to incentivize participation.

 

Our experience as defense attorneys working with this particular population tells us that, as currently constructed, its impact will likely be limited by several key challenges:

 

  • Capacity Constraints – Wellness Court serves too few people. Last year alone, the Defender Association handled more than 1,500 new adult cases linked to arrests near Kensington & Allegheny, yet only a small fraction of those individuals would be able to access this program.

 

  • Uneven Access to Immediate Treatment Services – While most defendants can be connected to services, individuals who are not eligible (due to out of county warrants, violations of probation, wanted cards, etc) are unable to access same day services because they are sent to State Road. This not only impedes the person’s direct access to treatment but also increases the prison population.

    This isn’t just an increase in the number of people—it’s an increase to the prison’s burden of caring for people with complex medical needs, at a time when severe staffing shortages at the jails make it difficult to meet basic care standards. If diversion is to work, it must be swift and seamless—every day in jail increases the risk of relapse, overdose, and further destabilization. It also strains our city’s resources as our jail is already embroiled in federal litigation over conditions of confinement.

 

  • Lack of Holistic Support from Trusted Resources – To its credit, the NWC has leveraged the relationships established through the Police Assisted Diversion program and partnered with a number of well respected treatment providers who offer a spectrum of services in the city.

    The challenge is that these providers focus solely on substance abuse treatment, neglecting clients’ legal issues, housing needs, and underlying disabilities. Substance use and mental health treatment needs are only part of the myriad challenges faced by many of our clients. The ramifications of their legal, family, or housing situations can be overwhelming, and often cause them to miss treatment or court scheduled court dates.

    Investing in our office to provide social services, case management and legal representation could increase engagement in treatment, reduce non-appearance at subsequent court events, and prevent subsequent engagement with the criminal legal system. Peer Navigators from our office could also be used to help increase voluntary attendance for treatment and other services.

 

  • Limitations On Eligibility for Transitional Housing  – The Riverside Wellness Village is exemplary in its recognition that recovery cannot happen without stable housing. It addresses the very real issue that many participants leave treatment with nowhere to go, making their path forward far more difficult. However, in recent weeks, we’ve seen that limiting these beds to people leaving inpatient facilities prevents those whose main issue is housing—not substance use—from accessing them until a permanent solution is found.

    The beds are available, but homeless individuals processed through Wellness Court for trespassing are not permitted to stay there and are instead directed to apply for housing through DBHIDS, a process which can take 3 to 4 weeks for placement.

 

  • Legal Barriers – While wellness court provides an alternative to incarceration, it still requires individuals to enter the court system first. We need to rethink diversion as a truly pre-arrest intervention. This avoids the trauma of arrest for the clients but also reduces the administrative burden on officers who are actively present and patrolling the Kensington neighborhood. This puts patrol officers in a challenging role as both social worker and police officer.  By contrast, teams of social workers, peer navigators, and those conducting outreach outside the criminal justice system, could accomplish the same goal pre-arrest by making same-day, immediate, voluntary and direct connections to people at risk for arrest.

 

Beyond Wellness Court: A Smarter Strategy 

 

With over two decades of experience defending people in this system, I can say with certainty: we cannot arrest or prosecute our way out of this crisis. We need an approach that prioritizes treatment first, not court first.

 

Instead of relying solely on post-arrest diversion, we should be investing in:

 

  • A Kensington Pretrial Diversion Hub – A dedicated resource center in Kensington where individuals can access treatment, housing, and behavioral health support before they face criminal charges. The facility that the city established at 265 E. Lehigh Avenue can easily serve this purpose. If councilmembers have not yet toured the facility, I’d encourage you to do so. But a physical building alone is only one component necessary for this effort to succeed. If we do not incorporate basic tenets of public health, prevention, protection, and promotion of health and wellness, into substance use disorder treatment, we will not achieve the long term goal of eradicating addiction and addressing quality of life for all Philadelphians, especially residents of Kensington.

 

  • Sustained Early Bail Review Services – With the support of the MacArthur Safety and Justice initiative, our office redesigned our interview process and dedicated experienced attorneys to staff early bail review hearings. These hearings prevent unnecessary incarceration and ensure people who may need additional support–like substance abuse treatment–have access to them immediately upon their release.Over the last five years, we’ve relied on our direct experience litigating these hearings to collaborate with the other stakeholders to establish reasonable program criteria and avoid the unnecessary pretrial detention of people who can be safely released. While all of the other justice system stakeholders have sustained funding from the MacArthur initiatives, Defender’s funding has not been sustained. Despite the city’s lack of commitment, we’ve expanded our decarceration efforts to include emergency bail hearings, reducing the prison population and decreasing reliance on FIR as an alternative to incarceration.

 

But we need to couple these early bail review hearings with meaningful opportunities for diversionary programming. We could accomplish this by expanding eligibility for

 

  • Housing as the Foundation – Without housing, every diversion effort will fail. We need to expand transitional and permanent supportive housing tied to diversion programs so that it is not limited to only those people with the most significant treatment needs. Furthermore, we need to prioritize all justice system-involved people for housing assistance. Instead of serving as an additional barrier to housing, an arrest, particularly for something like trespass, could and should signal that this person is most in need of housing support.

 

  • Community-Led Solutions – The most effective interventions are those that do not require court involvement at all. We need more investment in harm reduction, peer-led outreach, and direct connections to treatment services.


Conclusion

Our office’s experience in representing clients from marginalized and vulnerable populations have shown us firsthand the consequences of policies that rely on punishment rather than support. I myself have represented people whose struggles with addiction were met with incarceration instead of intervention. And I have seen how diversion—when done right—can change lives.

 

The Defender Association is committed to working with City Council, the courts, and community partners to implement meaningful solutions. But we must recognize that real diversion happens outside of the courtroom. If we want to reduce crime, save lives, and strengthen our communities, we must move away from criminalization and toward treatment, housing, and real public health responses. This includes prevention initiatives that address root causes of substance use, including mental health issues and exposure to trauma. It includes investing in protections for vulnerable people and creating meaningful emergency response plans for those whose involvement in the criminal legal system is tied to substance use disorder. It also promotes health and wellness by removing barriers linked to poverty, racism, and gender discrimination.

 

Thank you again for including the perspective of Defender Association in this critical conversation. My team and I welcome any questions you may have today or in the near future.

Defender Statement on Juvenile Detention Special Report

PHILADELPHIA—”Today’s Philadelphia Inquirer special report highlighting the alarming rates of juvenile detention and placement and the abusive conditions faced by young people in the justice system brings much-needed attention to a heartbreaking reality. We’re grateful to the Inquirer for shining a light on this issue and for sharing perspectives that show the real impact of these systemic failures. 

 

“We are also grateful for the exceptional advocacy of our leadership team and public defender, Brendan Lokka and to our client, Abdul Anderson. Our youth often express how terrified they are to speak up on their experiences in detention and placement. Adbul’s bravery in coming forward and speaking to his experience shines a bright light on what so many of our youth go through as they navigate an already traumatic and detrimental juvenile justice system.
 

“For too long, our youth justice system has fallen short in providing the care, safety, support, education, and rehabilitation that children need. The conditions described in the story aren’t isolated—they’re part of a larger problem rooted in outdated policies that focus on punishment instead of prevention, alternatives to detention and placement, and rehabilitation. The Defender Association has been calling for action and offering solutions, but meaningful change will require bold contributions from every leader and organization that plays a role in our system.  

 

“We’re committed to working together to build a youth justice system that prioritizes protecting and uplifting young people rather than causing further harm. We invite city and state leaders, community groups, and advocates to join us in making the changes our youth desperately need. 

 

“This is a moment to reflect on how we can shift resources from detention to supporting youth and families at home and in the community. If detention or placement is the only option, we must  invest in the trauma-informed rehabilitation and robust education and reentry support they deserve so that they can thrive.” 

 

# # #
 

Keisha Hudson on Passage of Prison Oversight Bill

PHILADELPHIA—“The Defender Association of Philadelphia applauds City Council–in particular, bill sponsors Isaiah Thomas and Nicolas O’Rourke–for the unanimous passage of prison oversight legislation. This bill represents a crucial step toward accountability and transparency in Philadelphia’s jails. 

 

“Managing over 4,000 individuals in secure facilities is a monumental task that requires effective oversight and community partnership. This legislation is an important first step toward building trust and ensuring the City’s correctional system is accountable for the safety of prison employees and incarcerated people.

 

“The passage of this bill is a pivotal moment for reform, but to be effective, every system stakeholder must collaborate on the implementation of this legislation and other solutions to the systemic challenges within our jails. The Defender Association remains committed to collaborating with justice system partners to create meaningful and lasting change.”

 

 

# # #

Follow us: @PhillyDefenders