Emergency Bail Hearings Safely Release 200 People

EBH has also helped reduce Philly’s prison population by over 1,000

 

PHILADELPHIA—One year after launching the Emergency Bail Hearing (EBH) initiative, the Defender Association of Philadelphia has helped more than 200 people safely return home while awaiting trial. Between October 7, 2024, and October 7, 2025, 230 people had their cases heard in Emergency Bail Hearings before Judge Karen Simmons. Of those, 216 people —93.9%— were ordered released. 

 

“This is what happens when justice system partners work together toward a shared goal of fairness and safety,” said Chief Defender Keisha Hudson, “The Emergency Bail Hearing program has given hundreds of Philadelphians a chance to fight their cases from home, stay connected to their families, and access the services they need to improve their lives.”

 

The EBH initiative is a collaboration between the Defender Association, the Philadelphia Department of Prisons (PDP), the First Judicial District (FJD), and the District Attorney’s Office (DAO). The program was launched to respond to the urgent need to safely reduce the city’s jail population amid severe staffing shortages and unsafe conditions.

 

Since the EBH program began, Philadelphia’s jail population has dropped dramatically — from 4,700 in October 2024 to under 3,600 since April 2025. While the Emergency Bail Hearings are only one part of this progress, they demonstrate what’s possible when justice system partners coordinate effectively.

 

“This program is proof that dialog and cooperation between Philly’s justice system stakeholders works,” said Hudson, “Working together to identify people who can be safely released is just one way we can create a more just and sustainable system for everyone.”

# # #

Join our Next Attorney Class!

We're now accepting applications for our Fall 2026 Attorney Class!

 

APPLY HERE

Overview

Start your legal career where you can make the most difference! Every year, the Defender hires a new class of attorneys—advocates who driven to have a positive impact on our clients from day one.

 

Each year, the Defender hires approximately 15 new attorneys to join our office in the fall. We will soon begin accepting applications for the Fall 2026 class. Eligible applicants include:

 

Individuals already admitted to practice in Pennsylvania

 

Law students who have completed their 2L or 3LE year and plan to sit for the Pennsylvania Bar Exam before September 2026

 

If you are still in law school and not yet eligible to apply for a staff attorney position, we encourage you to explore our Summer Internship Program. 

Our Process:

1. Resume, Cover Letter, and Transcript Review
We begin by collecting resumes, cover letters, and transcripts. Once they have all been reviewed, we'll move on to the next step.

 

2. Introductory Interview
Selected applicants will be invited to a brief interview (under 30 minutes) with the Director of Attorney Training and Recruitment or another senior team member. This may be conducted virtually if needed.

 

3. Written Follow-up Questions
Applicants advancing beyond the first interview will receive a short set of follow-up questions to complete in writing.

 

4. Panel Interview
Applicants selected for this round will participate in a simulation-style panel interview, held in person at the Defender Association.

 

The panel will include 2–3 senior attorneys portraying roles such as judge, prosecutor, and client.

 

This exercise is designed to reflect the courtroom advocacy and client-centered approach required of new attorneys at the Defender.

 

5. Final Interview

Applicants who excel in the panel interview will be invited to a final interview with members of the Defender executive team and others.

 

At this stage, we will request personal/professional references and an unofficial transcript.

 

Yes, this really is the final step!

 

Due to the volume of applications and the multi-step nature of our process, application review can take time. We appreciate your patience as we give each submission the careful attention it deserves.

Newly hired attorneys will take part in an intensive five-week training program that includes trial advocacy, courtroom observation, and instruction. Following training, new Defenders enter a structured rotation through trial and pre-trial units, starting in Municipal Court and culminating in jury trials in the Court of Common Pleas.

When does the application open?
We typically post the application in late August or early September to hire for the following fall. First-round interviews may take several weeks to begin after applications are submitted.

 

How many attorneys are hired each year?
While this may vary depending on the budget provided by Philadelphia City Council, we aim to hire at least 15 new attorneys for each Fall class.

 

Are only Fall Class positions available?
No. In addition to hiring for our Fall Class, we occasionally post openings for a Spring Class, and we regularly seek experienced attorneys to join our team. Visit our [Employment Opportunities Page] for current listings.

 

I didn’t attend a local law school and I’m not from Philadelphia. Should I apply?
Absolutely. We’re looking for passionate, committed litigators—no matter where you’re from. If you’re ready to fight for our clients in court, we want to hear from you.

 

Do you hire directly into appeals or policy work?
All new attorneys begin their careers at the Defender by completing the trial/non-trial rotation. Opportunities in appeals or policy are considered after this rotation is complete.

 

Who can I contact with questions about my application?
Feel free to reach out to:
Ben Jaye, Director of Attorney Training and Recruitment at or BJaye@philadefender.org.

We're now accepting applications for our Fall 2026 Attorney Class!

 

APPLY HERE

Immigrant Rights & Resources

Everyone in Philly has basic rights, included undocumented residents. We've provided some some basic information for our immigrant clients, families and communities to help you navigate what to do if you encounter ICE agents in Philly.

 

You can also download, print and share this info with your community: 

In English  |  In Spanish

Derecho a guardar silencio: No tienes que responder preguntas de la policía o de ICE sobre tu estatus migratorio, lugar de nacimiento u otros datos personales. Puedes preguntar con calma: “¿Estoy libre para irme?” Si dicen que sí, puedes irte. Si decides guardar silencio, dilo en voz alta: “Estoy ejerciendo mi derecho a guardar silencio” porque todo lo que digas puede usarse en tu contra.

 

Derecho a un abogado (y a un intérprete) en casos penales: Si la policía te arresta por un asunto penal, diles de inmediato que quieres hablar con un abogado. Tienes derecho a un abogado, y si no puedes pagar uno, un juez debe asignarte un defensor público. Si tienes el nombre o la tarjeta de tu abogado, dáselos a la policía; si no, pide una lista de servicios legales gratuitos. También tienes derecho a un intérprete en tu idioma para que puedas entender todo el proceso. No firmes nada ni aceptes ningún acuerdo sin que tu abogado esté presente.

 

Cómo conseguir un defensor público: Si te acusan de un delito y no puedes pagar por un abogado, tienes derecho a un defensor público. Sin embargo, la Defender Association solo puede representarse si un juez te asigna un defensor. Si te asignan uno, muestra su nombre o su tarjeta a la policía o al tribunal. Si no te asignan uno, la policía aún debe permitirte hacer una llamada gratuita. Pide una lista de organizaciones que ofrecen ayuda legal o apoyo a inmigrantes.

 

Derecho a un abogado en procedimientos de deportación: Si ICE te arresta por una violación migratoria, tienes derecho a un abogado, pero no se te asignará uno de forma gratuita. Debes conseguir tu propio abogado y cubrir los gastos legales. Si no tienes representación migratoria, pídele a ICE una lista de abogados de inmigración de bajo costo.

 

Si ICE llega a tu casa: No tienes que dejar entrar a agentes de inmigración a tu casa a menos que te muestren una orden de arresto válida firmada por un juez. NO abras la puerta para pedir la orden; mejor, habla con el agente desde la puerta y pídele que la pase por debajo o por la ranura del correo para que puedas leerla. Si tienes abogado, llámalo para que revise la orden contigo. Incluso en tu casa, mantienes tu derecho a guardar silencio. Si los agentes de ICE entran por la fuerza, mantén la calma, no resistas y di: “No doy mi consentimiento para que entren. Voy a guardar silencio. Quiero hablar con un abogado.”

 

Si ICE te arresta o detiene: Tienes derecho a guardar silencio y a llamar a un abogado. También tienes derecho a contactar al consulado de tu país (pide al oficial que los llame) y a recibir visitas de tu abogado, del consulado o de tu familia mientras estés detenido. No firmes ningún documento de inmigración (como una orden de deportación o una renuncia) sin hablar primero con un abogado. Asegúrate de decir claramente que deseas guardar silencio y hablar con un abogado antes de hacer o firmar cualquier cosa.

 

Si tus familiares quieren visitarte en detención migratoria: Ten en cuenta que cada centro de detención migratoria tiene reglas de visita diferentes. Tus familiares deben visitar el sitio web del centro para revisar los horarios de visita y luego llamar para confirmar los procedimientos. Tus familiares pueden averiguar dónde estás detenido visitando https://locator.ice.gov/odls/#/search. Una vez que sepan dónde estás, pueden encontrar las reglas de visitas para ese centro en: https://www.ice.gov/detention-facilities.


Derechos en la cárcel o en la corte:
Incluso como detenido o prisionero, conservas protecciones fundamentales. No pueden torturarte ni darte castigos crueles o inusuales. Tienes derecho a practicar tu religión, a condiciones humanas y al debido proceso bajo la ley (por ejemplo, un juicio justo en la corte). El estado debe tratarte con dignidad y respeto a tus derechos humanos básicos.

 

Cómo un caso penal puede afectar tu estatus migratorio: En Filadelfia, la policía no pregunta por tu estatus migratorio cuando te arrestan o registran. En la mayoría de los casos, la policía y las cárceles de Filadelfia no retienen a personas solo porque ICE lo solicite. Pero aún así es importante tener cuidado. Un récord penal —incluso un simple arresto o cargos pendientes, aunque no hayas sido condenado— puede cambiar tu elegibilidad para alivios migratorios y aumentar tu riesgo de ser detenido por ICE. Es crucial hablar con tu abogado penal sobre tu estatus migratorio de inmediato, para que pueda ayudarte a protegerte de consecuencias migratorias.

 

Ayuda local y recursos para representación migratoria: Si necesitas un abogado de inmigración y/o recursos generales para tu caso migratorio, llama o visita una de estas organizaciones para referencias y apoyo:

 

Juntos (grupo de derechos de inmigrantes en Filadelfia); 

Community Legal Services (ayuda legal civil gratuita); 

HIAS Pennsylvania (servicios legales y sociales); 

Nationalities Service Center (ayuda legal civil gratuita y/o de bajo costo); 

Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvanians (servicios de apoyo para personas no ciudadanas en Pensilvania); y

Pennsylvania Immigration and Citizenship Coalition (coalición de grupos que ofrecen servicios legales y extralegales para personas no ciudadanas en Pensilvania).

 

Defender Statement on ICE Arrests at the Courthouse

As ICE continues to stalk our courthouses and arrest our undocumented clients, the Defender Association of Philadelphia stands with community members demanding an end to fear, detention, and deportation. We are proud to represent all Philadelphians, regardless of immigration status—and we remain committed to defending those targeted by unjust and inhumane immigration enforcement.

 

But standing with immigrant communities requires more than words. Every day, undocumented residents are funneled into deportation proceedings—often without lawyers who understand both immigration and criminal law. Without legal representation, their futures, freedom, and families are at risk.

 

We are engaged in an ongoing effort to secure funding for a dedicated Immigrant Defense Unit. With the resources to build this team, we can ensure that no one in Philadelphia is left to face detention or deportation alone. As ICE detention and deportation increases here in Philadelphia,  if this city truly values due process and dignity, it must invest in real defense for our immigrant communities.

Statement on the Detention of a Defender Client by ICE

People living in Philadelphia should have the right to due process, regardless of their immigration status.

 

“Last week, after a Defender Association client’s case was dismissed at a preliminary hearing for lack of evidence, he was detained by law enforcement and transferred to the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), even though there was no outstanding warrant.

 

“We’ve raised this matter with the Courts, Philadelphia Police Department, Sheriff’s Office, District Attorney’s Office, Law Department, and City Council, and we are in active communication with immigrant rights organizations across the city.

 

“The Defender Association has long held that no one should be subjected to immigration enforcement while seeking justice in our courts. What happened last week is a deeply troubling reminder of the real risks faced by non-citizens navigating our justice system. It underscores the urgent need for the city to invest in legal protections for immigrant communities, including the creation of a fully staffed Immigration Unit at the Defender Association, a core priority outlined in our FY26 budget request.

 

“We remain committed to protecting the rights of all Philadelphians and fighting for a justice system that is fair and safe for everyone, regardless of immigration status.”

 

# # #

Testimony: Diversion Programs in Kensington

On February 26, 2025 Chief Defender Keisha Hudson & Managing Director of Trials Andrew Pappas testified before City Council about how Philly can do better for people struggling with addiction. While programs like the Accelerated Misdemeanor Program (AMP) and Forensic Intensive Recovery (FIR) are helping, too many end up in jail instead of getting the help they need. Read the full testimony below, or download a printable version here.

Watch the testimony video below:

Good morning, Chairwoman Lozada and Members of the Committee. I’m Keisha Hudson, Chief Defender for the Defender Association of Philadelphia. On behalf of the Defender Association, I want to thank you for inviting us to testify today on the effectiveness of diversion programs for individuals suffering from substance use disorder in the Kensington area.

 

In my 22 years as a public defender, I have represented countless individuals whose struggles with addiction led them into the criminal legal system—many of them had no opportunities for treatment extended to them until they were enmeshed in the criminal legal system. I have seen firsthand how our clients get into the system, what solutions work, and how we can sustain, expand, and strengthen the diversion programs that will help them break the cycle of addiction, succeed in recovery, and successfully reenter their communities. 

 

Accelerated Misdemeanor Program:

 

The Accelerated Misdemeanor Program (AMP) is a post-arrest diversionary program that is available for eligible arrestees with no or minimal criminal histories who are facing charges for non-violent misdemeanors. This program is a collaborative effort between our office, the Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual Disabilities, Public Health Management Corporation, the Philadelphia Police Department and the District Attorney’s Office. In November 2024, stakeholders agreed to expand eligibility criteria, allowing for more individualized participant assessments. AMP Court runs weekly and recent investments from city council, led by Councilmember Squilla and supported by many members of this committee, have improved our capacity to provide direct legal services and connection to treatment providers.

 

In the last four months (October 2024 - January 2025), we observed 446 referrals to AMP and only one revocation from the program. This high rate of success is in part attributable to the treatment providers presence in the courtroom, real time updates on program availability, and the direct transportation to treatment services they provide. Our office is also physically present to provide warm hand-offs for our clients directly to the treatment providers. 

 

Forensic Intensive Recovery (FIR) Program:

 

The FIR program was established in 1991 in response to a federal consent decree related to overcrowding in Philadelphia jails. FIR referrals were implemented as a population reduction strategy by removing those in need of treatment. While an alternative to incarceration program, and not a true diversion initiative, this program is typically discussed within the context of diversionary programming in the city.

 

Essentially, individuals who are incarcerated are referred for evaluation by a FIR evaluator to see if they qualify  for release in favor of placement at a substance abuse or mental health treatment facility. The evaluators are contracted by the City of Philadelphia to conduct the evaluations, generate and distribute reports, and assist in matching the client with an appropriate level of care. Our office processes all FIR referrals for our clients as well as those referred by private and court appointed attorneys.

 

As a result of our attorneys direct experience representing clients, we decided to take a closer look at the wait times people referred to the FIR program experience. We looked at referrals made from April to June 2024.  During that time period 654 FIRs were filed for 615 unique individuals. For 37 individuals, more than 1 FIR was filed on their behalf during an identical incarceration event so we only counted one FIR. For 2 individuals, more than 1 FIR was filed but during different incarceration periods, so we counted them as two unique referrals. So our final referral count was 617 FIRs for 615 individuals

 

Our review revealed that on average, it takes over two months for incarcerated people referred to FIR to be released from the jail. On average it takes 35 days from referral for the incarcerated person to be evaluated and then another 12 days for the report to be generated and circulated to justice system stakeholders. In 18% of referrals (113 individuals), the clients were released from the jail prior to their evaluation and were never evaluated by FIR. This is a missed opportunity to intervene. While we don’t usually discuss re-arrest, 45 of the clients (39%) released prior to their evaluation were subsequently re-arrested and re-admitted to the jail within 6 months. 

 

This process is simply not a sustainable solution to the substance use crisis we are facing in the city right now. Here at Defender, our social services staff are able to connect clients with evaluations and appropriate placement more effectively and efficiently than this process. But with limited social service advocates, serving all of our clients’ social services needs, we do not have the capacity to provide direct case management and coordination services to meet this need.

 

An additional investment in our office to expand our social services capacity to better serve all of our clients with substance use and behavioral health needs, especially those residing in or arrested in Kensington would go a long way to reducing the jail population, reducing recidivism, and offering the types of interventions people need when they are in the best position to voluntarily accept help and participate in treatment.

 

The Neighborhood Wellness Court (NWC) represents an important acknowledgment that substance use disorder is a public health crisis, not a criminal justice issue. But it ignores some of the more complicated realities of addiction and recovery. In theory, NWC offers participants an opportunity to engage in treatment and social services instead of incarceration. While this approach has the potential to help some individuals stabilize their lives, the approach relies on the threat of prosecution for a summary offense, without more, to incentivize participation.

 

Our experience as defense attorneys working with this particular population tells us that, as currently constructed, its impact will likely be limited by several key challenges:

 

  • Capacity Constraints – Wellness Court serves too few people. Last year alone, the Defender Association handled more than 1,500 new adult cases linked to arrests near Kensington & Allegheny, yet only a small fraction of those individuals would be able to access this program.

 

  • Uneven Access to Immediate Treatment Services – While most defendants can be connected to services, individuals who are not eligible (due to out of county warrants, violations of probation, wanted cards, etc) are unable to access same day services because they are sent to State Road. This not only impedes the person’s direct access to treatment but also increases the prison population.

    This isn’t just an increase in the number of people—it’s an increase to the prison’s burden of caring for people with complex medical needs, at a time when severe staffing shortages at the jails make it difficult to meet basic care standards. If diversion is to work, it must be swift and seamless—every day in jail increases the risk of relapse, overdose, and further destabilization. It also strains our city’s resources as our jail is already embroiled in federal litigation over conditions of confinement.

 

  • Lack of Holistic Support from Trusted Resources – To its credit, the NWC has leveraged the relationships established through the Police Assisted Diversion program and partnered with a number of well respected treatment providers who offer a spectrum of services in the city.

    The challenge is that these providers focus solely on substance abuse treatment, neglecting clients’ legal issues, housing needs, and underlying disabilities. Substance use and mental health treatment needs are only part of the myriad challenges faced by many of our clients. The ramifications of their legal, family, or housing situations can be overwhelming, and often cause them to miss treatment or court scheduled court dates.

    Investing in our office to provide social services, case management and legal representation could increase engagement in treatment, reduce non-appearance at subsequent court events, and prevent subsequent engagement with the criminal legal system. Peer Navigators from our office could also be used to help increase voluntary attendance for treatment and other services.

 

  • Limitations On Eligibility for Transitional Housing  – The Riverside Wellness Village is exemplary in its recognition that recovery cannot happen without stable housing. It addresses the very real issue that many participants leave treatment with nowhere to go, making their path forward far more difficult. However, in recent weeks, we’ve seen that limiting these beds to people leaving inpatient facilities prevents those whose main issue is housing—not substance use—from accessing them until a permanent solution is found.

    The beds are available, but homeless individuals processed through Wellness Court for trespassing are not permitted to stay there and are instead directed to apply for housing through DBHIDS, a process which can take 3 to 4 weeks for placement.

 

  • Legal Barriers – While wellness court provides an alternative to incarceration, it still requires individuals to enter the court system first. We need to rethink diversion as a truly pre-arrest intervention. This avoids the trauma of arrest for the clients but also reduces the administrative burden on officers who are actively present and patrolling the Kensington neighborhood. This puts patrol officers in a challenging role as both social worker and police officer.  By contrast, teams of social workers, peer navigators, and those conducting outreach outside the criminal justice system, could accomplish the same goal pre-arrest by making same-day, immediate, voluntary and direct connections to people at risk for arrest.

 

Beyond Wellness Court: A Smarter Strategy 

 

With over two decades of experience defending people in this system, I can say with certainty: we cannot arrest or prosecute our way out of this crisis. We need an approach that prioritizes treatment first, not court first.

 

Instead of relying solely on post-arrest diversion, we should be investing in:

 

  • A Kensington Pretrial Diversion Hub – A dedicated resource center in Kensington where individuals can access treatment, housing, and behavioral health support before they face criminal charges. The facility that the city established at 265 E. Lehigh Avenue can easily serve this purpose. If councilmembers have not yet toured the facility, I’d encourage you to do so. But a physical building alone is only one component necessary for this effort to succeed. If we do not incorporate basic tenets of public health, prevention, protection, and promotion of health and wellness, into substance use disorder treatment, we will not achieve the long term goal of eradicating addiction and addressing quality of life for all Philadelphians, especially residents of Kensington.

 

  • Sustained Early Bail Review Services – With the support of the MacArthur Safety and Justice initiative, our office redesigned our interview process and dedicated experienced attorneys to staff early bail review hearings. These hearings prevent unnecessary incarceration and ensure people who may need additional support–like substance abuse treatment–have access to them immediately upon their release.Over the last five years, we’ve relied on our direct experience litigating these hearings to collaborate with the other stakeholders to establish reasonable program criteria and avoid the unnecessary pretrial detention of people who can be safely released. While all of the other justice system stakeholders have sustained funding from the MacArthur initiatives, Defender’s funding has not been sustained. Despite the city’s lack of commitment, we’ve expanded our decarceration efforts to include emergency bail hearings, reducing the prison population and decreasing reliance on FIR as an alternative to incarceration.

 

But we need to couple these early bail review hearings with meaningful opportunities for diversionary programming. We could accomplish this by expanding eligibility for

 

  • Housing as the Foundation – Without housing, every diversion effort will fail. We need to expand transitional and permanent supportive housing tied to diversion programs so that it is not limited to only those people with the most significant treatment needs. Furthermore, we need to prioritize all justice system-involved people for housing assistance. Instead of serving as an additional barrier to housing, an arrest, particularly for something like trespass, could and should signal that this person is most in need of housing support.

 

  • Community-Led Solutions – The most effective interventions are those that do not require court involvement at all. We need more investment in harm reduction, peer-led outreach, and direct connections to treatment services.


Conclusion

Our office’s experience in representing clients from marginalized and vulnerable populations have shown us firsthand the consequences of policies that rely on punishment rather than support. I myself have represented people whose struggles with addiction were met with incarceration instead of intervention. And I have seen how diversion—when done right—can change lives.

 

The Defender Association is committed to working with City Council, the courts, and community partners to implement meaningful solutions. But we must recognize that real diversion happens outside of the courtroom. If we want to reduce crime, save lives, and strengthen our communities, we must move away from criminalization and toward treatment, housing, and real public health responses. This includes prevention initiatives that address root causes of substance use, including mental health issues and exposure to trauma. It includes investing in protections for vulnerable people and creating meaningful emergency response plans for those whose involvement in the criminal legal system is tied to substance use disorder. It also promotes health and wellness by removing barriers linked to poverty, racism, and gender discrimination.

 

Thank you again for including the perspective of Defender Association in this critical conversation. My team and I welcome any questions you may have today or in the near future.

Request Defender Services Online

Reach out to us!

Our clients don't have to wait to reach out for help from the Defender Association! We offer services that you can request right here at PhillyDefenders.org:

Adult & Juvenile Criminal Record Expungements:

An expungement is an order that requires state and local criminal justice agencies to erase something from a record. We provide these services for our adult and youth clients. Click below to learn more about expungements.

 

ADULT RECORD EXPUNGEMENTS

 

JUVENILE RECORD EXPUNGEMENTS

 

Probation Termination

Defender clients can apply through our website to have their probation terminated.

 

PROBATION TERMINATION INFO & APPLICATION

 

Client Interviews

If you have an upcoming case and are represented by a Defender attorney, you can request an initial client interview

 

SCHEDULE AN INTERVIEW

 

Philly Justice System Tutorial

If you or a loved one have an open case, watch this series of videos that explains the process from arrest to sentencing

 

WATCH THE VIDEOS HERE

 

Join Our Youth Action Board!

Are you 18-23, currently system involved, or have you transitioned out of the system? Do you have something to say? Apply to join our Youth Action Board!

 

The Youth Action Board (YAB), is a youth-led collective that aims to amplify the voices of older youth (ages 18-23) who have experienced the foster system. Together, our mission is to evoke change and bring awareness to the issues older youth face as they transition out of the system.

 

The YAB advocates for:

 

-Raising awareness for youth and connecting them with important services;

-Dismantling systemic injustice and improving legal representation;

-Encouraging services that are culturally aware, trauma informed, and courteous;

-Conflict resolution and effective communication; and

-Promoting leadership, story telling, and uplifting

 

The YAB will campaign, organize, and advise on issues strictly impacting Older Youth in child-serving systems. This group will guide how to better serve and represent youth in ways that respect their agency.

 

This is an opportunity for you to be heard and to be at the forefront of making a difference! Apply to be a part of the Youth Action Board!

 

Fill out the Youth Action Board application here

 

Download and share the Youth Action Board Flyer

 

 

Follow us: @PhillyDefenders